This is when we settle for a solution or intervention that is not what we wanted. It’s a non-ideal alternative that is still acceptable. This could be slightly less than ideal or the lesser of two evils. Either way, we only compromise if we believe it is the best alternative available. This is a question of effectiveness.

Everyone can start their own charity because we like feeling that we are in control of the difference we make, or we can pool resources and increase our impact (the real objective) by stepping away from the less important derailers.

When we compromise effectiveness for efficiency, ie. doing things that do not support our core mission in a cheaper, faster way, we have not compromised, we sacrificed the queen.

Healthy compromise is only possible when we break through the noise of the stuff we think are important but aren’t.

Will compromise help us achieve our core objectives faster?

Shirly Niv Marton

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s